Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41518 of 2003 Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kr. Srivastava,Swarn Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to accord seniority to the petitioner by regularising his services with effect from the date of his initial appointment i.e. 10.6.1986 with all the consequential benefits."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018
Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anil Kr Srivastava Swarn Kr Srivastava