Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43359 of 2021 Applicant :- Gyanesh Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jag Narayan,Renu Singh,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard Sri V.P. Srivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Jag Narayan, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
As per prosecution case, the vehicle was intercepted; the applicant and Prakash Mishra came to be arrested; recovery of 68 vial of Liposomal Amphotericin B Injection was recovered.
It is urged by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused Madhuram Bajpai @ Sumant and Vijay Kumar have been enlarged on bail by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court; co-accused Prakash Mishra was enlarged on bail on 18.06.2021 by the court below; applicant claims parity with Prakash Mishra. It is urged that recovery is without independent witness; applicant came to be arrested from his house on 17:33 hours, whereas, as per prosecution case, applicant was arrested at 20:30 hours; the drug on mere opinion of the doctor was taken to be spurious; this fact has not yet been examined by the expert. It is lastly submitted that the applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent and he is languishing in jail since 28.05.2021, there is no likelihood of early disposal of trial and the applicant undertakes that if enlarged on bail, he will never misuse his liberty and will co-operate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Let the applicant, Gyanesh Kumar Sharma, involved in Case Crime No. 78 of 2021, under sections 420, 274, 275, 468, 471 I.P.C. and Section 18(A)(IV)/27 Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Police Station Gwaltoli, District Kanpur Nagar, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 24.12.2021 K.K. Maurya