Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Guruvindala Venkamma vs The State

High Court Of Telangana|21 January, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.29543 of 2013 Between:
Dated 21st January, 2014 Guruvindala Venkamma And …Petitioner The State rep.by the District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Rama Rao Kochiri Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.2 has not been issuing pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of Acs.3.86 cents in R.S.No.16/3 of Ankannagudem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District.
It is the pleaded case of the petitioner that her father Thota Pentaiah, purchased an extent of Acs.31.10 cents of land in the above- mentioned survey number in the year 1960 and that he has died leaving behind three daughters, including the petitioner. It is the further case of the petitioner that she has inherited Acs.11.10 cents and that the LTR case for ejection of the petitioner registered on the application of the Special Deputy Tahsildar vide S.R.No.243 of 2001 ended in favour of the petitioner under order, dated 23.06.2001 passed by the Special Deputy Collector (TW), K.R.Puram. The petitioner further pleaded that out of the total extent of Acs.11.10 cents, she was granted title deeds only in respect of Acs.7.24 cents and that therefore she has filed a representation on 05.10.2012 before respondent No.2 for issue of pattadar pass books and title deeds for the remaining extent of Acs.3.86 cents.
As noted above, the grievance of the petitioner is that the said representation is not considered by respondent No.2.
Though time was taken by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare on two occasions, no instructions have been reported.
Having regard to the innocuous grievance of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that it is not necessary to await instructions from the respondents. Instead, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, if the same was received by him, hold an enquiry, take an appropriate decision and communicate the same to the petitioner, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36700 of 2013 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 21st January, 2014
VGB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Guruvindala Venkamma vs The State

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
21 January, 2014
Judges
  • C V Nagarjuna Reddy
Advocates
  • Sri Rama Rao Kochiri