Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Gurunam Singh vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40642 of 2019 Applicant :- Gurunam Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav,Atmaram Nadiwal,Dharmendra Singhal(Senior Adv.) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri A.R. Nadiwal and Sri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mithlesh Kumar learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.398 of 2019 u/s 147, 148, 149, 394, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 and 307 IPC PS Jhinjhana District Shamli.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the anticipatory bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the impugned FIR and also looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 SP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gurunam Singh vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Dinesh Kumar Yadav Atmaram Nadiwal Dharmendra Singhal Senior Adv