Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Guru Darshan Public School vs The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore Urban District And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.48481 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
GURU DARSHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL NO 23, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD GOTTIGERE BENGALURU – 560083 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI B VISHWANATH. … PETITIONER (By Mr. GANAPAHI BHAT, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT KANDHAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD BENGALURU – 560009.
2. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560025.
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE HULIMAVU POLICE STATION HULIMAVU BANGALORE-560083.
4. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560002.
5. SRI T PUTTARAJU S/O LATE TAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO 2,3 AND 4 BANK OF BARODA BUILDING, HULIMAVU GATE BEHIND VGP SHOWROOM BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU – 560076. … RESPONDENTS (By Mr. PRAKASH ADV. FOR R5 Mr. Y D HARSHA AGA FOR R1 & R3 Mr. SHARATH MULIA ADV., FOR Mr. RAVINDRA R ADV., FOR R2 Mr. I G GACHCHINAMATH ADV., FOR R4) - - -
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the R-1 to inspect the spot and take suitable action to stop the opening of petrol bunk adjacent to the petitioner school which is morefully described in the schedule and etc.
This Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.Ganapathi Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.Prakash M.K., learned counsel for the respondent No.5.
Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent No.1 and 3.
Sri.Sharath Mulia, learned counsel for Sri.Ravindra R., learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
Sri.I.G.Gachchinamath, learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
2. In view of the subsequent developments which have taken place during the pendency of the writ petition, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive this petition in case the grievance of the petitioner still survives.
Sd/- JUDGE RV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Guru Darshan Public School vs The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore Urban District And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe