Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34938 of 2018 Applicant :- Gurdeep Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The applicants are driver and cleaner of the vehcile wherein the alleged recovery of liquor purchased from Haryana was made by the police. It has been argued that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The applicants have no criminal history and are in jail since 28.04.2018.
On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties,larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicants Gurdeep Singh and Guddu involved in Case Crime No.687 of 2018, under Sections 60/63 Excise Act and under section 420 I.P.C, Police Station Izzat Nagar, District- Bareilly be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicants will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 17.9.2018 SS