Gujarat vs Bhupendrasingh

Shri Meena, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners contended that though assuming for the sake of arguments that there was a breach of Section 25G of the I.D. Act, but that itself was not sufficient to order reinstate in given facts and circumstances of the case. The Labour Court could have couched the relief in accordance with provisions of law, which by now crystallized in respect of such a claim.

Notice pending admission returnable on 05.10.2009.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top