Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Growmax Machinery vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 92 of 2019 Petitioner :- M/S Growmax Machinery Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Ankur Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Suyash Agrawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the State.
Learned Special Counsel contends that the goods have already been released in this matter. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this fact.
In view of the above, this writ petition has become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Growmax Machinery vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Suyash Agarwal Ankur Agarwal

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.