Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

G.R.D.Jewellers vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Madras High Court|27 July, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Mr.Adithya Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepting notice for the first respondent.
2. In the light of the order this Court proposes to pass in this writ petition, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with.
3. The petitioner seeks for a direction upon the first respondent to cancel the registration obtained by the second respondent under the provisions of TNVAT Act, 2006, on the ground that the petitioner is carrying on business in the same premises and has got a valid registration under the TNVAT Act in their name.
3. The first respondent without verification and without conducting inspection of the said premises, has issued license to the second respondent in the same premises. From the documents filed in the typed set of papers, it is seen that the first respondent has already issued a show cause notice to the petitioner on 29.06.2017, proposing to cancel their registration. Thus, it appears that the petitioner's registration is yet to be cancelled.
4. However, the petitioner has raised a very important point stating that the first respondent has given registration in favour of the second respondent without even inspecting the premises. Therefore, at this juncture, this Court does not propose to issue any positive direction to cancel the license issued by the first respondent, but shall direct the first respondent to adjudicate the show cause notice dated 29.06.2017 issued to the petitioner. Before adjudicating the show cause notice, the first respondent shall conduct a surprise inspection of the premises and ascertain as to who is carrying on business in the said premises and thereafter, afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as the second respondent, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, after considering the case of both the parties and also taking note of their written objections.
5. The above direction shall be complied with, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

G.R.D.Jewellers vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2017