1.Issue notice. Mr.Veludoss, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1. Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 4. With the consent of the learned counsels for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.
2.The limited relief that the petitioner seeks is that, respondent no.4 should consider the petitioner's request for granting exemption in terms of clarification dated 13.04.2016, issued by the transport department, qua, the notification dated 15.04.2015, bearing no.G.S.R.No.290 (E).
3.It is the petitioner's claim that he is the owner of a 2002 vehicle manufactured by M/s.Swaraj Mazda. According to the petitioner, the unladen weight of the said vehicle is 2800 Kgs, while Gross laden weight (as per the permit appended at page 15 of the typed set of documents) is 8800 Kgs.
4.The petitioner claims that he does not need to install a speed governor, in view of the notification dated 15.04.2015 read with clarificatory notification dated 13.04.2016, as the subject vehicle is inherently incapable of clocking speed over 80 Km per hour. 4.1.It is, in this context, that the instant writ petition has been filed.
5.Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, who appears for respondent nos.2 to 4, says, that if, the vehicle is produced for examination, the same will be tested and the contention made before the Court on behalf of the petitioner, will be verified in the light of the notification dated 15.04.2015, read with, clarification issued by the transport department on 13.04.2016.
6.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.4, to entertain the request of the petitioner, for grant of exemption from notification dated 15.04.2015, as clarified by the transport department's notification dated 13.04.2016. 6.1.In this behalf, respondent no.4 will have the subject vehicle examined and only thereafter, grant exemption, if the petitioner comes, within the purview of the clarification notification, dated 13.04.2016, issued by the transport department. 6.2.It is made clear that, if it is, found at some stage that the certificate issued by respondent no.4 is not accurate, the concerned officer will be held responsible for the same.
7.The writ petition is disposed of in the aforementioned terms. Consequently, the connected pending application is also closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
23.02.2017 pri Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To 1 The Secretary Ministry of Road Transports & Highways, Union of India, New Delhi.
2 The Secretary Home (Transport) Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009.
3 The Transport Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
4 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (East), Chennai 600 078.
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
pri W.P.No.4570 of 2017 And W.M.P.No.4781 of 2017 23.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in