Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Gram Panchayat Parauri Thru ' Its Pradhan vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19925 of 2006 Petitioner :- Gram Panchayat Parauri Thru' Its Pradhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, we ourselves have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i)issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the case and quash the impugned order dated 6.3.2006 by which respondent no. 4 appointed as dealer.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 not to supply the essential commodities to the respondent no. 4."
3. We ourselves have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gram Panchayat Parauri Thru ' Its Pradhan vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar