Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

G.Perumal vs K.Venu Chettiar

Madras High Court|04 August, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represented that the sole revision petitioner died and he has also filed a memo to that effect.
2. In view of the said representation made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, recording the memo, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.
1. The First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam.
2. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tindivanam.
Crl.R.C.No.1183 of 2012
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

G.Perumal vs K.Venu Chettiar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 August, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.