Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Gowramma And Others vs Non Compliance Of The Order Dated

High Court Of Karnataka|30 May, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO CCC.No.1116/2016 AND CCC.Nos.1273-1332/2016(CIVIL) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O SRI H.N.NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SMT. MUTTU LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 3. SRI GANGADHARA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 4. SRI KUMARA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 5. SRI JAYARAMAIAH S/O CHIKKAHONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 6. SRI MANJUNATH S/O LATE CHIKKAHONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 7. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O LATE HONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 8. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE KODAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 9. SMT. HONNAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAHONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 10. PUTTA HONNAPPA S/O LATE KUNTAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 11. SMT. MANJAMMA D/O SIDDAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 12. SMT. DEVIRAMMA W/O LATE KODAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 13. SRI RAMA MURTHY S/O LATE HONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 14. SRI KODAPPA S/O LATE KENCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 15. SMT.YASHODA W/O CHENNIGARAYAPPA D AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 16. SRI.KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE KUNTAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 17. SMT.PUTTAGOWRAMMA W/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 18. SRI CHENNIGARAPPA S/O LATE HONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 19. SRI SHIVANNA S/O LATE KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 20. SRI K NANJUNDAPPA S/O PATEL KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 21. SRI.LOKESH S/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 22. SRI NIGAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 23. SRI CHANDRASHEKAR S/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 24. SRI KODAPPA S/O LATE KEMPANNA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS 25. SRI NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE KEMPANNA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 26. SRI NAGESH S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 27. SHIVANNA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 28. H N NANJAPPA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 29. SMT. THAYAMMA W/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 30. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 31. SRI SRINIVASAIAH S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 32. SRI KOTAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 33. SMT. MARAKKA LATE MUTHANARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 34. SRI KEMPAIAH S/O BOGANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 35. SRI HONNAPPA S/O BOGANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 36. SMT. PREMA W/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 37. SMT. KALAHUCHAMMA W/O LATE PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 38. SRI RAVI KUMAR S/O PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 39. SRI KEMPANNA S/O LATE GANESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 40. SRI NAGARAJU S/O CHIKKAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 41. SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 42. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE GANESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 43. SRIKANTAIAH S/O LATE CHANDRAHASA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 44. SRI HONNE GOWDA S/O LATE CHADRAHASA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 45. SRI K C SHIVANNA S/O CHADRAHASA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 46. SRI MUTTURAJAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 47. SRI RAVI AYYANNA S/O AYYANNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 48. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 49. SRI KRISHNAPPA W/O LATE KEMPAHONNAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 50. SRI PUTTALINGAIAH S/O LATE SAJJALINGAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 51. SRI DEVARAJU S/O LATE LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 52. SRI THIMMAIAH S/O LATE MUGURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 53. SMT. SUNDARAMMA W/O LATE VARASAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 54. SMT. HANUMAMMA W/O LATE MARILINGAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 55. SRI RAJU(SC) S/O CHIKKAMAIGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 56. SRI RAJU S/O LATE DADI MAIGAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 57. SRI VENKATESH S/O LATE KARIVENKATAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 58. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O MAIGAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 59. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE NINGAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 60. SRI GURUPUTRA S/O LATE MORIPUTTAIAH(SC) AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 61. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA(SC) W/O LATE GURUJOGAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS ALL ARE PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT HULTHAR, HOSADODDI, BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
…COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI K.SUBBA RAO SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SATHEESHA K N, ADVOCATE) AND:
DR SMT. MAMATHA B R THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA-526 159.
…ACCUSED (BY SRI D NAGARAJ, AGA FOR A-1 TO A-5) THESE CCCs ARE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANTS PRAY THAT THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO ISSUE NOTICE TO THE ACCUSED AND TAKE APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM AND PUNISH THEM ACCORDING TO LAW FOR THE DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 01/02/2013 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION Nos.25490-25557/2012(KLR-RR/SUR) MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C.
THESE CCCs COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The basis of the present proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act is the alleged breach and non- compliance of the order dated 11.08.2009 read with order dated 01.02.2013 read with order dated 20.12.2013 passed in the respective writ petitions and the contempt proceedings.
2. We would have further considered the matter for appropriate action against the respondent-accused, however, the learned Government Advocate Mr.D.Nagaraj has declared before us that he had telephonic talk with the accused and it has been conveyed to him that the directions in the writ petitions shall be complied within an outer limit of three months and no extension shall be prayed for. He further states that Mr.Devaraju, Assistant Conservator of Forest, Ramanagara and Mr.Shivakumar N., Tahasildar, Ramanagara Taluk are also present and he has taken instructions.
3. In view of the above, we direct the respondent- accused to comply with the directions within three months from today. It is needless to mention that the matter is sufficiently delayed for the purpose of compliance and therefore any breach of the present direction may be seriously viewed by the Court. Learned Government Advocate shall communicate this order to the accused.
4. In view of the above, we do not find that the present proceedings are required to be continued further. Hence, dropped and disposed of accordingly.
5. Liberty to the complainants to revive in the event the direction issued by this Court today are not complied with.
6. Interlocutory application would not survive since the main matter is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE SBN
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Gowramma And Others vs Non Compliance Of The Order Dated

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2017
Judges
  • N K Sudhindrarao
  • Jayant Patel