Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Gowramma And Others vs Mysuru Urban Development Authority And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|23 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.54194 OF 2018 (LA-UDA) BETWEEN:
1. SMT GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS W/O LATE MARIYAPPA @MARAIAH D/O LATE BASAVAIAH #35 NANNESHWARA ROAD THAMMADAGERI BEEDI HINKAL VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE MYSURU - 570017 2. SRI B NAGAPPA S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS NANNESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD #320 THAMMADAGERI STREET HINKAL MYSURU - 570017 3. SRI H B SUBRAMANYA S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS #59 ESHWAR TEMPLE ROAD HINKAL MYSURU – 570 017 4. SRI RAMESH H B S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS #319 ESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD HINKAL MYSURU – 570 017 (BY MR. K R LINGARAJU, ADV.) AND:
1. MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER … PETITIONERS J L B ROAD MYSURU – 570 005 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY J L B ROAD MYSURU - 57005 … RESPONDENTS (BY MR. G B SHARATH GOWDA, ADV. FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 02.11.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. H.C. Shivaramu, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.K.R.Lingaraju, learned learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.G.B.Sharath Gowda, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. Heard.
3. For the reasons assigned by this Court by an order dated 02.08.2014 passed in W.P.Nos.49502/2013 & 56493-494/2013 & 54495-499/2013 (LA-UDA) and connected matters, the impugned endorsement dated 02.11.2018 at Annexure is quashed and the writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and with similar directions.
In addition, the petitioner along with the representation shall submit the documents in support of his contention that he is the legal representative of the original khatedar.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS AAJ:
02.08.2019 WP No.54194/2018 ORDER In the order dated 23.07.2019, the words “H.C.Shivaramu, learned Counsel for the petitioner’ are directed to be deleted and also at page No.3 of the order after the word ‘Annexure’, the word ‘A’ shall be read.
This order shall be read in conjunction with the order dated 23.07.2019.
Sd/- JUDGE ln.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Gowramma And Others vs Mysuru Urban Development Authority And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
23 July, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe