Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31328 of 2002 Petitioner :- Govindjee Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- S.C., K.S. Shukla
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for records of Selection Committee and quash the impugned sanctioned letter dated 11.3.2002 (Annexure No. 9 to the petition) issue by opposite party No. 3 to the alleged Manager of the said institution.
b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the entire selection process which has been held in violation of the said rules in the said institution.
c. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties not to interfere in the working of the petitioner as a Clerk in the said institution and to pay salary and other emoluments regularly.
d. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to regularize and absorb the services of the petitioner in the said institution in view of the facts and circumstances that the post of a clerk is become substantively vacant post at present after the retirement of erstwhile clerk of the said institution."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu