Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Govindaraju vs The Director Of Survey And Land ...

Madras High Court|15 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.] The affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition is bereft of particulars.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner contented that it was only the Trichy City Corporation instrumental in promoting the lay out. However, there are no documents to substantiate the said contention. We, therefore, dismiss the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive Writ Petition, after furnishing all the necessary particulars. No costs.
To:
1.The Director of Survey and Land Records, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
2.The District Collector, General Section, Collectorate New Building, Trichirappalli-1.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, R.C.Division WRD, Public Works Department, Musiri, Trichirappalli District.
4.The Commissioner, Trichirappalli City Corporation, Trichy.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Govindaraju vs The Director Of Survey And Land ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 September, 2017