Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Govind Verma @ Manu Verma vs State Of U.P. Through Secy.Home ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Yogendra Kumar Sangal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
No case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is made out. However, the trial court is directed to consider the bail application of the petitioner expeditiously, in the light of Full Bench judgment of this Court, reported in 2005 Crl. L.J. 755 Amarawati and another (Smt.) versus State of U.P. as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2009 SCC (Crl) 330 Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh versus State of U.P. and others.
Subject to above, without entering into the merit of the controversy, the writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.
Order Date :- 17.6.2010 Kaushal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Govind Verma @ Manu Verma vs State Of U.P. Through Secy.Home ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 June, 2010

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.