Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7538 of 2019 Applicant :- Govind @ Anuj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Govind @ Anuj seeking bail in Case Crime No. 362 of 2018, under Sections 147, 323, 308, 506 IPC, Police Station Ghosi, District Mau.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that even according to the prosecution own case, in the FIR, general role of assault has been assigned to as many as five persons, due to which, victims Yashwant and Golu suffered injuries on their head.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next drawn the attention of the Court towards the statement of the victim Golu, in which, he has categorically stated that the applicant Govind assaulted him by lathi on his head, due to which, he suffered injuries, which was advised for X-Ray, however, there is no X-Ray report available on record, as such, injuries cannot be said to be dangerous to life.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the police report has already been submitted in the present case and the chances of trial being concluded in near future is very bleak due to heavy dockets.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is in jail since 29.09.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
Per contra, learned AGA for the State has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts and the fact that the applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is in jail since 29.09.2018.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Govind @ Anuj be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 21.2.2019 Nadim