Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Others vs Mrs Premavathy

Madras High Court|27 July, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by HULUVADI G.RAMESH,J.)
1. This Writ Appeal is filed challenging the order dated 03.10.2016, passed in W.P.No.30028 of 2015, whereby, the learned single Judge directed the Government to pay interest for the belated payment of the terminal benefits.
2. The facts in brief are as follows:
The respondent herein is the mother of one Kanchana, who was appointed as Junior Assistant in the Revenue Department in the year 1993. She was transferred to the Office of the Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai. It appears, that due to some matrimonial dispute, the said Kanchana nominated her mother, i.e., the respondent herein to receive her service benefits. The said nomination was effected in her service records. Due to the said matrimonial issues, the said Kanchana died on 25.1.2002. Since the terminal benefits due to the said Kanchana were not settled, the respondent, being the mother of the deceased Kanchana, had approached this Court by way of a Writ Petition.
3. This Court, by order dated 03.10.2016, allowed the Writ Petition observing as follows:
"7. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court cited above, the present writ petition is allowed and the impugned order of the first respondent in G.O.No.236 dated 28.5.2015 in so far as the non-payment of interest on belated payments towards earned leave surrender, leave on private affairs and pay commission arrears, SPF 20, SPR 50 and salary is set aside. The respondents are directed to pay interest at the appropriate rate for the belated payment of the terminal benefits of the petitioner viz.,
1. Pay commission arrears :1.4.2008 to 23.7.2014 6 years 4 months
2. Earned leave surrender :26.1.2002 to 12.5.2014 12 years 4 months
3. Surrender on leave on Private affairs :26.1.2002 to 2.7.2014 12 years 6 months
4. Special provident fund :26.1.2002 to 12.5.2014 Rs.20/- p.m. 12 years 4 months
5. Special provident fund :26.1.2002 to 2.7.2014 Rs.50/- p.m. 12 years 6 months
6. Four days salary for :26.1.2002 to 2.7.2014 January 2002 12 years 6 months within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs."
4. Aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge granting interest on the belated payment, the State has filed the present appeal.
5. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants submitted that in pursuance of the direction of this Court in W.P.No.28814 of 2011, the terminal benefits due to the respondent has been sanctioned. Further, there is no specific rule provision for payment of interest to Earned Leave and Un-earned leave on private affairs, duty salary etc. He further submitted that the delay was only due to the legal dispute between the respondent and her family members and not on the part of the Government. Hence, the order of the learned Single Judge may be set aside.
6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that it is well settled that an employee is entitled to interest on the belated payments. He relied upon G.O.(1D) No.271 dated 24.04.2017 and submitted that interest at the rate of 8% per annum was sanctioned by the Government in the case of one Senthilvel. Hence, the appellants may be directed to grant interest for the belated terminal benefits.
7. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the materials placed before this Court.
8. As per G.O.(1D) No.271 dated 24.04.2017, on the terminal benefits, one would entitle for 8% interest. In that view of the matter, we are inclined to order interest at the rate of 8% per annum. Accordingly, the order of the learned Single Judge is modified to the extent that the respondent is entitled to interest at the rate of 8% p.a. from the date when the legal issue that has been settled between the respondent and the husband of the deceased, till the date of payment.
9. The Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. However, there will be no order as to costs.
Index : Yes/No (H.G.R.,J) (G.J.,J) Speaking order/Non-speaking order 27.07.2017 sl HULUVADI G.RAMESH,J.
AND Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
sl W.A.No.818 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.11443 of 2017 27.07.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Others vs Mrs Premavathy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2017
Judges
  • Huluvadi G Ramesh
  • G Jayachandran