Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Gotendra Yadav vs U.O.I.Thru.Secy.Ministry Of ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|04 May, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.B. Pandey, learned A.S.G. of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the Union of India.
By means of the present writ petition, a challenge has been made to the order of dismissal dated 15.04.2019, passed by the respondent No. 4/Commandant Office, Unit Head Quarters, 71 BN SSB, Mothiari Camp at Piprakothi, Post- Pipra Factory, Police Station, Piprakothi, District- East Champaran, State- Bihar.
Sri S.B. Pandey, learned A.S.G. of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the Union of India raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of territorial jurisdiction of this Court as also availability of a remedy of appeal under Rule-29 of Rule-29 of Sashastra Seema Bal Rules, 2009, which is a statutory remedy.
The aforesaid could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum, as aforesaid.
Order Date :- 4.5.2021 Arun/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gotendra Yadav vs U.O.I.Thru.Secy.Ministry Of ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
04 May, 2021
Judges
  • Saurabh Lavania