Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Gopal Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 25
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58891 of 2017 Petitioner :- Gopal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shanker Yadav,Mahendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
This petition is directed against an order passed by the Additional/Joint Director, Treasury and Pension, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh dated 13.10.2017, requiring the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Varanasi to submit a revised proposal for consideration of the petitioner's case for the grant of pension and other post-retiral benefits, after excluding the period of service rendered by him, prior to his regularisation, as a Lekhpal.
2. Heard Mr. Daya Shanker Yadav, Advocate, along with Mr. Mahendra Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L.K. Tiwari, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel along with Mr. Sharad Chand Upadhyaya, the learned State Law Officer on behalf of the State- respondents.
3. Identical questions of fact and law are involved in the present petition, as those in Writ - A No. - 58889 of 2017.
4. For the reasons given in my order of date passed in Writ - A No. - 58889 of 2017, which shall form part and parcel of this order, this writ petition fails and stands dismissed .
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
Order Date :- 24.12.2021 I. Batabyal (J.J. Munir, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gopal Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 December, 2021
Judges
  • J J
Advocates
  • Daya Shanker Yadav Mahendra Kumar