HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CMA.No.587 of 2014 Date:03.07.2014 Between:
Gonda Hari Prasad, S/o Shankaraiah And:
Naroju Virender, S/o Late Narender and four others.
……Appellant ..…Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Sri G.Venkata Reddy Counsel for the respondents: ---
The Court made the following:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CMA.No.587 of 2014 JUDGMENT:
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of order, dated 19.03.2014, in I.A.No.895 of 2012 in O.S.No.163 of 2012 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Karimnagar.
I have heard Sri G.Venkata Reddy, the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.
For disposal of this appeal, detailed facts need not be recorded. It will suffice to note that respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein-plaintiffs have filed the above- mentioned suit for partition of the suit schedule properties. It is the pleaded case of respondent Nos.1 to 3 that their grandfather, i.e., the husband of respondent No.4 and father of respondent No.5, died and that therefore, they have succeeded to a part of the suit schedule properties. It is their further pleaded case that the husband of respondent No.4 has executed a registered will in favour of his wife and that respondent No.4, in turn, executed a registered gift deed in favour of respondent No.5 and thus, respondent No.5 had legal and valid title for conveying the property in favour of the appellant. The appellant (defendant No.3) has purchased a part of plaint ‘A’ schedule property from respondent No.5.
The Court below, on appreciation of the pleadings and the evidence on record, granted temporary injunction in favour of respondent Nos.1 to 3.
At the hearing, Sri G.Venkata Reddy, the learned counsel for the appellant, tried to strongly persuade this Court and after realizing that this Court is not in favour of setting aside the order of the lower Court, requested for disposal of the appeal with a direction to the lower Court to dispose of the suit itself at an early date.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, while declining to interfere with the order of the lower Court, the appeal is dismissed with the direction to the lower Court to dispose of O.S.No.163 of 2012 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
As a sequel to dismissal of the appeal, CMAMP.No.856 of 2014 is dismissed as infructuous.
JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA
REDDY
03rd July, 2014 DR