Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Gomtiben Savjibhai & 7 ­S

High Court Of Gujarat|17 February, 2012
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. These appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and award dated 27.12.1993 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) in M.A.C.P. No.135/1985, 764/1986 and 136/1985 whereby, the claim petitions were allowed in part and the original claimants were awarded compensation of Rs.2.64 Lacs, Rs.31,200/- and Rs.5.00 Lacs along with interest at the rate of 15% per annum from the date of application till its realization with proportionate costs.
2. The above claim petitions came to be filed in respect of the vehicular accident that took place on 12.08.1984 in which several persons were injured and a minor girl had expired.
3. The main contention raised on behalf of the appellant-Insurance Company is that the injured persons and deceased were travelling in a 'goods vehicle' and therefore, no liability of making payment of compensation can be saddled upon the Insurance Company. In support of the above submission, reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha Rani and others, AIR 2003 S.C. 607 (1).
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears from the record that the vehicle in which the deceased was travelling at the time of accident was a 'goods vehicle'. Under the provisions of the M.V. Act. the Insurance Company of a 'goods vehicle' cannot be fastened with the liability of making payment of compensation, if any injury is caused or death takes place while travelling in such vehicle. Considering the facts of the case and the principle rendered in Asha Rani's case (supra), the Insurance Company cannot be held liable to make payment of compensation.
5. For the foregoing reasons, the appeals are allowed. The impugned common judgment and award passed in M.A.C.P. No.135/1985, 764/1986 and 136/1985 are quashed and set aside only qua the extent of imposition of liability upon the appellant-Insurance Company to make payment of compensation. It is, however, observed that if the amount deposited before the Tribunal is already withdrawn by the original claimants, the same shall not be recovered from the original claimants but, the appellant-Insurance Company shall be at liberty to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle. If the amount has not been withdrawn by the original claimants, the same shall be refunded to the Insurance Company and the claimants shall be at liberty to recover the balance amount from the owner of the offending vehicle. The appeals stand disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.
[K. S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gomtiben Savjibhai & 7 ­S

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
17 February, 2012
Judges
  • Ks Jhaveri Fa 1909 1994
  • Ks Jhaveri
Advocates
  • Mr Rajni H Mehta