Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Golu Rajbhar @ Santosh Kumar And Others vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary Department Of Home U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4899 of 2018 Petitioner :- Golu Rajbhar @ Santosh Kumar And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Its Secretary Department Of Home U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
An impleadment application has been filed today by learned counsel for the petitioners for impleading the victim as petitioner in the present petition.
The impleadment application is allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the victim as petitioner in the present petition.
Office is directed to allot a regular number to the present impleadment application.
Heard Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Ibha Sinha, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 12.2.2018 registered as case crime no. 13 of 2018 under sections 363, 366 I.P.C., police station Maniyar, District Ballia.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the kidnapped girl shall be produced before the court concerned, it is directed that in case the alleged kidnapped girl Km. Sunita Rajbhar appears/produced before the court of learned C.J.M. concerned within 20 days from today and moves an application for her medical examination, recording her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C, the learned Magistrate concerned shall fix a date for the same purpose, on that date the first informant & officer in charge of the police station concerned shall be summoned, she shall be produced before C.M.O. concerned by the concerned police officer for her medical examination thereafter she shall be produced before CJM concerned for recording her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. the same shall be recorded on the application filed by the I.O./Officer in charge of the police station concerned, till then no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioners, in default of it, it shall be opened to the police authority concerned to arrest the petitioners, if she is found major and does not support the FIR version, the petitioners shall not be arrested till submission of the police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. but the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation. In case the alleged kidnapped girl appears to be minor or if she is major but supports the prosecution version, it shall be opened to the police authority to arrest the petitioners. In case the petitioners approach the S.S.P. concerned to provide the security for the above mentioned purpose, the same shall be provided to them.
It is further directed that issue of custody of the alleged kidnapped girl shall also be decided by the CJM concerned in accordance with law.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.
(Krishna Pratap Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 28.2.2018 Shiraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Golu Rajbhar @ Santosh Kumar And Others vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary Department Of Home U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Bhanu Pratap Singh