IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.44345 OF 2018 (SC-ST) BETWEEN:
GOKULDAS WAREHOUSING CORPORATION A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT II FLOOR GOKALDAS CHAMBERS NO.222, 5TH MAIN ROAD SADASHIVNAGAR, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU-560 080 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. RAJENDRA J. HINDUJA ... PETITIONER (BY SRI D. R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE ) AND:
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PODIUM BLOCK, VISHVESWARAIAH TOWER 1ST FLOOR, DR AMBEDKAR VEDHI ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION DODDABALLAPUR BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU-561 205 4.CHINAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT BEEMAKANAHALLI VILLAGE SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU-562 114 5.NARASIMAMURTHY B. C. S/O CHINAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT BEEMAKANAHALLI VILLAGE SULIBELE HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU-562 114 6.NARASAMMA D/O CHINAPPA W/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT BELLURU VILLAGE NARASAPURA HOBLI KOLAR TALUK AND DIST-563101 7.SARASWATHAMMA @ SAMPATHAMMA D/O CHINAPPA W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT HAGALU KOTE VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110 8.MUNIRATHNAMMA D/O CHINAPPA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT UPARAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU-562 114 9.SHIVASHANKER S/O CHINAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT BEEMAKANAHALLI VILLAGE SULIBELE HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE-562 114 10.SMT PREMA @ PREMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS D/O MUNIANJINAMMA W/O SRINIVAS R/O MALLAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE MASTHI HOBLI MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563101 11.SRI NAVEEN AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS D/O MUNIANJINAMMA R/O TALAKUNTE VILLAGE LAKKURU HOBLI MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563101 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-3 SRI BHARATH.K. ADVOCATE FOR C/R-4 TO R-11) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-F THE ENTIRE PROCEEDIGNS BEFORE THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN PROCEEDINGS AND DECLARE THAT THE APPLICATION FILED BY R-4 TO 11 BY INVOKING THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA S.ST (PTCL) ACT, 1978 EITHER IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE R-2 VIDE ANNEX-F IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN Y THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF NEKKANTI RAMALAKSHMI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA, FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER JUDGMENT IN VIVEK M HINDUJA AND OTHERS VS.
M. ASHWATHA AND OTHERS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo dated 22.07.2019 is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE HR