Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Global Calcium Pvt. Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs

Madras High Court|29 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.)
1. After some arguments, Mr.Derrick Sam, seeks to withdraw the captioned appeal. Learned counsel, however, says that he has only one apprehension, which is, that the Adjudicating Authority may subject the claim for duty drawback to the time limit of three months provided in the Circular No.36/2010-Cus., dated 23.09.2010 (in short, 2010 Circular).
2. According to us, this apprehension is misplaced, as in paragraph 6 of the order, the Tribunal has, clearly, stated that the time bar provision will not apply in this matter.
3. Needless to say, since, the Revenue has not come up by way of cross objection, they cannot raise any cavil about limitation of three months prescribed in the Circular.
4. We may also indicate that neither Rule 12(1)(a) of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995, nor Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, (in short, the Act) prescribes, any time limit for processing the claim of duty drawback.
4.1. Furthermore, Mr.Chopda, has not been able to show any other provision in the Act or, the Rules framed thereunder, which provide for a time limit for processing the claim lodged for duty drawback.
5. As indicated above, the Tribunal has not accepted the stand of the Revenue that the Assessee's claim can be subject to time limit, as provided in the 2010 Circular.
6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Resultantly, pending application shall stand closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Global Calcium Pvt. Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2017