Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

G.Jayalakshmi vs R.Balamurugan

Madras High Court|14 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing on 08.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 14.02.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2. Even today (14.02.2017), when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel. Hence, Tr.C.M.P is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
14.02.2017 srn To
1.The III Additional Family Court, Chennai
2.The Family Court, Pondicherry.
Tr.C.M.P.No.606 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

G.Jayalakshmi vs R.Balamurugan

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 February, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.