1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred, with the following prayers:
"(a) To quash and set aside the decision of the Collector 7.02.2012 rejecting the application of the petitioner for grant of non-agricultural use permission on the ground of non-supply of requisite documents, and further direct the Collector, Vadodara to decide the application of the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law.
(b) To pass any other order or orders in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. At the outset, Mr. Dhaval G. Nanavati, learned advocate for the petitioner, states that the interest of justice would be met, if the petitioner is permitted to resubmit the documents as called for by the Collector by letter dated 05.12.2011 and the Collector may be directed to take the said documents into consideration and pass an appropriate order.
3. Upon the above statement being made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, the following order is passed:
In the event that the petitioner resubmits the documents as called for by the Collector by letter dated 05.12.2011, within a period of ten days from today, the Collector shall take the same into consideration and pass an appropriate order upon the application made by the petitioner on 16.11.2011. The decision shall be rendered in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of submission of the documents.
4. The petition is disposed of, in the above terms, without entering into the merits of the case.
Direct Service of this order, is permitted.
(Smt.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top