IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 6588/2019 BETWEEN GIRISHA @ GIRISHA C.R S/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT HOLALU VILLAGE DUDDA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 570 401 (BY SRI. RAJAYOGA K, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MANDYA EAST POLICE STATION MANDYA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 2. RUTHPARNA R.P D/O PALANETHRA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS RESIDING AT HOLALU VILLAGE MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 570 401 REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN- SMT.SHASHIKALA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS (BY SRI. HONNAPPA, HCGP) ... PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.53/2019 (SPL.C.C.NO.175/2019) OF MANDYA EAST POLICE STATION, MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 342, 363, 366, 376, 354D OF IPC, SECTION 4, 6 OF POCSO ACT, AND SECTION 3(1)(R)(S)(W) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned HCGP submits that, the notice issued to Respondent No.2-complainant is served. Therefore, the service of notice to Respondent No.2 is held sufficient.
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the trial Court immediately after examination of the material witnesses.
In view of the above submission, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
KGR* Sd/-
JUDGE