Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42238 of 2018 Applicant :- Girish Chandra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Dhar Dwivedi,Sadhna Upadhyaya,Sant Sharan Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
Submission of the counsel is the matter relates to the year 1998 when the F.I.R. was lodged in which the applicant was not named. Later on the charge sheet was submitted against one Ramphal Sharma and no charge sheet was submitted against the applicant. After several years the complicity of the applicant is said to have surfaced in the crime. Submissions is that the applicant has already retired in the year 2015 and he is an ailing old man and there is absolutely no chance for him to abscond away from the course of justice and it has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and is prepared to submit to the jurisdiction of the court and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has also been pointed out that the accused is not having any criminal history and he is in jail since 4.10.2018 and that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence, the period of detention already undergone, the unlikelihood of early conclusion of trial and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.
Let the applicant- Girish Chandra, involved in Case No. 4117 of 2017, Case Crime No. 216 of 1998, u/ss. 408, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 204, 120B I.P.C., P.S.- Banda, District- Shahjahanpur, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned on the following conditions :-
(1) The applicant will not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever.
(2) The applicant will personally appear on each and every date in the court and his personal presence shall not be exempted unless the court itself deems it fit to do so in the interest of justice.
It may be observed that in the event of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed for the cancellation of applicant's bail.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Naresh