Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ginni Arora And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7662 of 2021 Applicant :- Ginni Arora And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, Ms. Ruchi Arora, opposite party no.2 in person and perused the material available on record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the Charge-Sheet dated 14.08.2019 and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.
147 of 2019 (State Vs. Loveleena Arora and others), under Section 323 IPC, Police Station Nazirabad, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that charged section is non-cognizable section and the learned Magistrate may pass an order taking cognizance, if he so desires, by proceeding under Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Reliance has been placed to explanation 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows:-
"Explanation-- A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint, and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant."
Per contra, learned AGA has submitted that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the application pending and the matter be decided finally.
Therefore, on the basis of aforesaid Explanation, which has been interpreted in a Single Judge decision of this Court passed in Application u/s 482 No.45609 of 2018 (Santosh Kumar and 2 others vs. State of U.P. and others), decided on 31.1.2019, where it has been held that when the charge-sheet is only of non-cognizable offence, in view of the aforesaid provision, the charge sheet should be treated as a complaint. The argument is well founded and the order taking cognizance is set aside. Now, the Magistrate may pass an order taking cognizance, if he so chooses, by proceeding in this matter as a complaint case under Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He can also keep in mind Proviso (a) to Section 200 Cr.P.C., which reads as follows:-
"Provided that, when the complaint is made in writing, the Magistrate need not examine the complainant and the witnesses."
(a) If a public servant acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duties or a Court has made the complaint;"
With these observations, this application under Section 482 CrPC is partly allowed.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021 Nadim
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ginni Arora And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 August, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar Mishra