1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ghanshyam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2019


Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14380 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddhartha Srivastava,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhagwan Dutt Pandey Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This writ petition has been filed against the Private Bank, which is not the State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, therefore, it is not maintainable before this Court.
However, it is open to him to take recourse to the remedies which are available to him under the law. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.4.2019 Lbm/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Ghanshyam vs State Of U P And Others


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

25 April, 2019
  • Bharati Sapru
  • Siddhartha Srivastava Pradeep Kumar