Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ghanshyam Tewari vs Additional Commissioner And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38795 of 2006 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Tewari Respondent :- Additional Commissioner And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- N.L. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that this writ petition has become infructuous.
Learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the State-respondents, who does not objects to the prayer.
This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ghanshyam Tewari vs Additional Commissioner And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 April, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • N L Pandey

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.