The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is challenging the impugned notice issued by the 2nd respondent. Pursuant to the said notice, the respondent has passed the final orders on 26.05.2013. Hence, the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
15.02.2017 pvs To
1. The Regional Transport Authority, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.
2. The Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, High Court Campus, Chennai 104.
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J., pvs W.P.No.18756 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 15.02.2017