(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: G.CHANDRAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 249 of 2013 Between:
1. The General Manager, S.C.Rly, Railway Nilayam, Secunderabad.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Sanchalan Bhavan, Secunderabad.
3. Senior Divisional Personnel Manager, South Central Railways, Sanchalan Bhavan, Secunderabad.
4. The Divisional Accounts Officer, South Central Railways, Sanchalan Bhavan, Secunderabad.
Revision Petitioners/J.Drs 2 to 5/ Defendants 2,3,4 & 5 AND
1. Dulam Seethamma, W/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochipadu (M), Prakasam District.
2. Dulam Venkataramana, S/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, Constable in RPF, Tenali, Guntur District.
3. Dharmavarapu Padmaja, W/o. Subba Rao, Household, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochipadu (M), Prakasam District.
4. Dulam Vijayalaxmi, D/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochi Padu Mandal, Prakasam District.
Respondents/Plaintiffs 1,2,3 and 4
5. Chunchu Komuramma, W/o. Rajalingam, Vegetable Vendor, R/o. Devannapet (V), Hasanpathy (M), Warangal District.
Respondent/Defendant No.1 Whereas the Petitioners above named through their Advocate Smt. Pushpinder Kaur, presented this petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to revise the order of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal made in EP.No. 195/2010 in OS.No. 47/1995 dt. 03-01-2013.
And whereas the High Court, upon perusing the petition and the memo of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. Pushpinder Kaur, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Sri Nandigama Krishna Rao, Advocate for the Respondents 1, 3 & 4, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this petition should not be admitted.
You viz:
1. Dulam Seethamma, W/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochipadu (M), Prakasam District.
2. Dulam Venkataramana, S/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, Constable in RPF, Tenali, Guntur District.
3. Dharmavarapu Padmaja, W/o. Subba Rao, Household, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochipadu (M), Prakasam District.
4. Dulam Vijayalaxmi, D/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochi Padu Mandal, Prakasam District.
5. Chunchu Komuramma, W/o. Rajalingam, Vegetable Vendor, R/o. Devannapet (V), Hasanpathy (M), Warangal District.
..2..
are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in this petition and the memo of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this Civil Revision Petition should not be admitted.
The Court further made the following ORDER:
“ The learned counsel appearing for the caveator takes notice for the respondents and seeks two (2) weeks time for filing counter. Meanwhile, interim stay of the impugned order, subject to the compliance of the decree by depositing half of the benefits as granted in the decree, within a period of four (4) weeks from today.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal.
2. Dulam Seethamma, W/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochipadu (M), Prakasam District.
3. Dulam Venkataramana, S/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, Constable in RPF, Tenali, Guntur District.
4. Dharmavarapu Padmaja, W/o. Subba Rao, Household, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochipadu (M), Prakasam District.
5. Dulam Vijayalaxmi, D/o. Late Dulam Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Medaramatla, Kochi Padu Mandal, Prakasam District.
6. Chunchu Komuramma, W/o. Rajalingam, Vegetable Vendor, R/o. Devannapet (V), Hasanpathy (M), Warangal District. (2 to 6 by RPAD along with a copy of Petition and Memo of Grounds)
7. One CC to Smt. Pushpinder Kaur, Advocate(OPUC) 8 One spare copy.
SAH HIGH COURT GCJ DATED: 07-02-2013 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CRP.NO. 249 OF 2013 INTERIM STAY DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 12-02-2013 HIGH COURT GCJ DATED: 07-02-2013 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CRP.NO. 249 OF 2013 INTERIM STAY