HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No. 33960 of 2014 Date :20.11.2014 Between :
M/s. Geetha Engineering Works, Rep by its Proprietor S Karunakar R/o H No 4-4-710/D, Nehrunagar, Tirupati, Chittoor dist … Petitioner and The State of AP, rep by its Secretary, Revenue Dept, (Registration) Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No. 33960 of 2014 ORDER:
The case of the petitioner is that the land to an extent of Acs.26.00 cents which was covered by Survey No.74/7 of Akkarampalli belongs to Government and the same was alienated to Tirupati Urban Development Authority.
The Tirupati Urban Development Authority has handed over the said land to Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (for short ‘the APIIC’) for the purpose of establishment of Auto Nagar. The APIIC divided the land into plots. The petitioner purchased plot Nos.237.
2. As the petitioner intends to register the property in his name, he approached the Registrar, Balaji Registration Office, Chittoor District-4th respondent, who in turn, refused to receive the documents on the ground that the registration was stopped in respect of the land in Survey No.74 of Akkarampalli Village. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land concerning the very same survey number is the subject matter of issue before this Court in several writ petitions. In W.P.No.14439 of 2011, plots purchased by the petitioner therein situated in Survey No.74/7 agitated before this Court against the action of the respondent- authorities in not processing the document for registration. This Court disposed of the said writ petition by order, dated 19.01.2012 and observed that the respondent authorities have no right to prevent the petitioner therein from enjoying his absolute rights and consequently directed the respondents 1 to 5 therein that they shall not have any right to prevent any transaction by the petitioner vis-à-vis the plot allotted to him by the 5th respondent.
3. Following the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of holding that the respondents 1 to 4 shall not have any right to prevent any transaction by the petitioner vis-à-vis the plot allotted to petitioner by the APIIC. No costs. Miscellaneous petition, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 20.11.2014 Tvk HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No. 33960 of 2014 Date :20.11.2014