Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Geetam Shree vs Raj Kumari And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 33
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2991 of 2018 Petitioner :- Geetam Shree Respondent :- Raj Kumari And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Maujood Ahmed,Abhishek Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The present petition has been filed for a direction upon the Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Sikohabad, Firozabad to decide temporary injunction application 6- C filed by the plaintiff in Original Suit No. 592 of 2017 within a stipulated period.
From the order-sheet of the case, it appears that the defendant had already entered appearance through a caveat application and the matter is under consideration of the court below though, on the last two dates, the matter had to be adjourned on account of lawyers strike.
In view of the above, no specific direction need be issued.
It is observed that the court below is not bound to adjourn the proceeding if the lawyers are abstaining from work. The court concerned shall therefore endeavour to bring the proceeding on the pending applications to its logical conclusion, unless there is any legal impediment in doing so.
With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.4.2018 Sunil Kr Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Geetam Shree vs Raj Kumari And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2018
Judges
  • Manoj Misra
Advocates
  • Syed Maujood Ahmed Abhishek Kumar Yadav