Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

G.Bhoopathi Pandian vs M/S.Samarth Creations

Madras High Court|04 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The only question which arise for consideration in this appeal is whether the learned Single Judge in terms of the impugned order dated 23.11.2011 was right in opining that the following clause cannot be construed as an arbitration clause:-
14. The disputes if any arising under this agreement between the parties hereto shall be settled through a reference made before the South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce, Chennai and in the event of the award or decision is not satisfied then the aggrieved party can redress the same before the City Civil Court, Chennai at the cost and expenses of the defaulting party.
2. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned Single Judge that the aforesaid clause can by no stretch of imagination be construed as an arbitration clause, but an endeavour for conciliation and that the parties have to approach the Civil Court in case that process is not fruitful.
3. The application filed by the appellant under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has thus rightly been rejected.
4. The appeal is dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

G.Bhoopathi Pandian vs M/S.Samarth Creations

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 January, 2017