Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Gayatri And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11453 of 2019 Petitioner :- Gayatri And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Tripathi,Rajeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.
This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 5.4.2019, registered as Case Crime No.57/2019, under Sections 366/120-B IPC, P.S. Makhanpur, Firozabad.
The FIR lodged by the father of the victim alleges that the victim has been enticed away by accused Suneel Kumar / petitioner no. 2.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the victim, as per the allegations made in the FIR, is about adult 19 years and she has voluntarily married Suneel / petitioner no.2.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the submission on the ground that the issue of age and consent of victim can be appropriately dealt with by the court below.
Having perused the record and submissions made by the parties, we deem it appropriate to dispose off this petition by providing as follows:-
The petitioner no.2 shall produce the petitioner no.1 / victim before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned on or before 14.5.2019. Upon her production, the C.J.M. shall proceed to record her statement to ascertain whether any force has been used on her or she of her own accord is in the company of the petitioner no.2. In case the victim deposes that force has been used on her, the C.J.M. shall proceed to pass appropriate orders immediately in respect of her custody/protection. However, in case the victim deposes that she of her own accord is in the company of petitioner no.2 or any other person and that no force has been used on her, the learned Magistrate shall call upon the Investigating Officer of the case and fix a date for appearance of the informant or the parents or natural guardian of the victim for the purpose of recording statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
On the basis of the statement of the victim, the police shall submit report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid exercise shall be completed preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of the victim before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. Till 14.5.2019, or the date on which the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the above case. Thereafter, if the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, as directed above, the accused shall be dealt with as per the statement of the victim.
It is further clarified that if the victim is not produced by the date fixed as above, there shall be no protection and the investigation agency shall be free to take all steps that may be necessary to bring the investigation to its logical conclusion.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Chandra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gayatri And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Vijay Tripathi Rajeev Kumar