IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION Nos.41566/17 & 47115-47118/17(KLR-CON) BETWEEN:
GAUTHAM S VARAD S/O SRINIVASA RAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/A.NO.12, 10TH MAIN RMV EXTENSION,SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE – 560082. ..PETITIONER (BY SRI K S RAMU, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA,BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMPETENT AUTHORITY BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE DISTRICT BANGALORE – 560 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T S MAHANTESH, AGA) 2 THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATIONS DATED 1.6.2011, 5.8.2011, 30.11.2012, 1.10.2013 AND 31.5.2013 AND ON 25.4.2015 THE COPY OF WHICH IS NOT AVAILABLE WITH THE PETITIONER RESPECTIVELY, VIDE ANNEXURES: L, M, N, O AND P.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo informing this Court that the contesting respondents/State has issued an Official Memorandum dated 10.04.2019, therefore, these petitions have become infructuous. Hence, he seeks for dismissal of the same.
Memo is taken on record.
Writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
brn Sd/- JUDGE