Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Gauri Shankar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5776 of 2019 Petitioner :- Gauri Shankar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The expert report dated 15.06.2018 obtained by respondent no.3 has been placed before the Court is taken on record to submit that the answer given by the petitioner to question no.14 of question Booklet Series-B i.e. "अननकक लन" is not correct, and the correct answer is "ववतववरण कक सवथ सवममजसय" i.e. adaptation of plant or animal with its environment.
A perusal of the key answer indicates that three answers to question no.14 of Question Booklet Series-B have been stated to be correct therein which are; "अननकक लन"; "Adaptation"; "ववतववरण कक सवथ सवममजसय". The word "Adaptation" as per the Webster's Dictionary is a 'Noun' which means the act or process of adapting; the condition of being adapted/(Biology meaning of which is) an inherited or acquired structure or function serving to fit a plant or animal for its environment. The word "अननकक लन" is hindi translation of "adaptation", the same, therefore, is found correct. On the basis of opinion of the expert dated 15.06.2018, it cannot be said that the answer given by the petitioner is incorrect.
It is admitted that the petitioner has obtained '66' marks in the original result and there has been no change in the re- evaluation, and answer to question no.14 has been assigned "Zero" mark.
For the aforesaid, the re-evaluation done by the respondent no.3 is found incorrect. One mark is to be provided to answer to question no.14 to the petitioner and his result is to be revised, accordingly.
The respondent no.3 namely Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority, U.P. at Allahabad is directed to declare the revised corrected result, as aforesaid, by uploading it at the website, within a fortnight from today.
The present petition is, thus, allowed. Order Date :- 29.4.2019 Himanshu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gauri Shankar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 April, 2019
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi