Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Gaurav Mishra vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 90
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41618 of 2019 Petitioner :- Gaurav Mishra Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the present writ petition. It has been contended by him that the petitioner has got an alternative remedy against the impugned order dated 09.07.2019 to file an appeal before the Commissioner concerned.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid contention made by the learned Standing Counsel.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable on the ground of alternative remedy.
However, if the petitioner prefers an appeal within a period of 15 days from today, it shall be entertained and decided by the appellate authority ignoring the period of limitation.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Amit Mishra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gaurav Mishra vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2019
Judges
  • Piyush Agrawal
Advocates
  • Sanjeev Kumar Pandey