Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Ganpath Construction vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court|16 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
16.11.2017 Speaking/Non speaking Index: Yes/No vsi To
1. The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The Engineer in Chief, Public Works Department/Water Resources, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J. vsi
3. The Chief Engineer, Tiruchy Region, Pudukottai Road, P.B.No.803, Subramaniapuram, Tiruchirappalli - 620 020.
4. The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department/ Water Resources Department, Upper Cauvery Basin Circle, Salem-7, Salem District.
W.P.No.25804 of 2017 16.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ganpath Construction vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 November, 2017