1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ganesh Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 February, 2019


Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2684 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ganesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is eligible for promotion on Class-III post which are lying vacant, and that the petitioner fulfils eligibility condition for grant of promotion on such post.
2. Sri Ram Nath, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Satendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that the rights of the petitioner do not exist in isolation and that for grant of promotion all eligible candidates would have to be considered first before any promotion may be made.
3. Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending or calling for a counter affidavit. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner files an appropriate representation in this regard before respondent no. 3 within a period of three weeks from today alongwith a copy of this order, the said authority may pass appropriate order in respect of her claim and initiate the exercise of promotion in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 21.2.2019 AKJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Ganesh Kumar vs State Of U P And Others


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

21 February, 2019
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
  • Navin Kumar Srivastava