Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Gajendra Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56859 of 2019 Applicant :- Gajendra Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Counsel for Applicant :- Shri Krishan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Shri Krishan Yadav , learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant (upon appearance filed today) as well as Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Devendra Singh with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. - 421 of 2019, under Sections - 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station - Thakurdwara, District - Moradabad, during pendency of trial.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:
(i) the applicant is accused of offence of attempt to murder and other charges, punishable with imprisonment upto life;
(ii) against FIR lodged on 8.10.2019, the applicant is in confinement since 7.11.2019 ;
(iii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest;
(iv) the applicant has no criminal history;
(v) charge-sheet has already been submitted yet there is no hope of early conclusion of the trial;
(vi) on prima facie basis, only for purpose of grant of bail, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the injuries attributed to the applicant are simple in nature and have not been ascribed specifically to the applicant. In any case, there is one single serious injury which has been attributed to the co-accused Naresh, not to the present applicant.
(vii) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State and or the informant that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness.
4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
5. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.
6. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Prakhar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gajendra Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Shri Krishan Yadav