IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.109 OF 2017 BETWEEN GAJENDRA SINGH SAHNI, S/O S RAJENDRA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/A NO.8/4, ‘VASANT VIHAR’, NEW DELHI – 110 057.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI.VARADARAJAN M.S., ADVOCATE) AND 1. JAIPRAKASH NARAIN, S/O LATE R.N.PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/A NO.100, 5TH CROSS, GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE – 560 079.
2. HARPREET SINGH DHESI, S/O SHIVACHARAN SINGH DHESI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A NO.461, 80 FEET ROAD, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 098.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SADASHIVAIAH K.G., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.4 IN O.S.NO.92/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI, DISMISSING THE IA NO.4 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 A AND D OF CPC., PRAYING TO REJECTING THE PLAINT.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Memo dated 03-12-2019 is filed stating that the suit from which the present revision petition arises has been disposed off and the revision petition has become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.2/2017 do not survive for consideration. Hence, the same is rejected.
Sd/- JUDGE SMJ