IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.25711 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
GAJANANA VIDHYA SAMASTHE REPRESENTED BY MANAGING TRUSTEE C.R.BHASKER REDDY R/AT HUNEGAL, N.H.7, GUNDLAGURKI POST, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT-562 101.
(By MR. DEEPAK J, ADV.) AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SHASHTRI BHAVANA, NEW DELHI-110 115.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
3. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION NEW ANNEXURE BUILDING, OPP GOVERNMENT ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, … PETITIONER NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009.
4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHICKABALLAPUR ZILLA PANCHAYATH CHICKABALLAPUR-562 101.
5. JOINT DIRECTOR OF MIDDAY MEALS OPPOSITE TO KAVERI BUILDING K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 002.
6. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT, CHICKBALLAPUR-562 101.
7. EDUCATION OFFICER MID DAY MEAL, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, CHICKBALLAPUR CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT-562 101.
8. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR MID DAY MEAL, TALUK PANCHAYATH, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR-562 101.
(By MR. Y D HARSHA, AGA FOR R-2, 3 5 & 8 … RESPONDENTS MR. D A ANIL LAKSHMINARAYAN, CGC FOR R-1 MR. B J SOMAYAJI, ADV. FOR R-4 & 7) - - -
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD.27.3.2017 VIDE ANNEX-K1 AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO SUPPLY THE MID DAY MEAL AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.Deepak J., learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate counsel for the respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 and 8. Sri.D.A.Anil Lakshminarayan, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent No.1.
Sri.B.J.Somayaji, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 7.
2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that in view of the order dated 21.03.2016 passed in W.P.Nos.21864-21866/2015, the matter has been rendered infructuous on account of efflux of time.
3. For the reasons assigned in the aforesaid order and in view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE RV