Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Gabriel Udaiyar vs Dhanapragasam

Madras High Court|24 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter was listed yesterday (23.03.2017), there was no representation for the sole appellant.
2. Mr.A.Muthu kumar, learned counsel on record was present, on behalf of the sole respondent and he was ready to argue the matter.
3. Therefore, this court directed the second appeal to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today.
4. Today (24.03.2017) also, there is no representation for the sole appellant.
5. Today also, Mr.A. Muthu Kumar, learned counsel for the sole respondent, is present and he is ready to argue the matter.
As there is no representation for the sole appellant on two consecutive days, though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today, second appeal is dismissed for default/non-prosecution.
24.03.2017 gv Index:yes/no M. SUNDAR, J.
gv To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.
2. The District Munsif's Court, Jeyankondam.
S.A.No.1633 of 2000 24.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Gabriel Udaiyar vs Dhanapragasam

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 March, 2017