IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.761/2018 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN:
1. G.S. MANJUNATH S/O G.M. SURYA NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT 3RD BLOCK 4TH MAIN ROAD KUVEMPU NAGAR TUMKUR – 572 101.
2. A. GOVINDARAJU S/O ALAKASWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT GANGAVATHI KOPPAL DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI MANJUNATHA N., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB) KHANIJA BHAVANA, 4TH & 5TH FLOOR RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2. DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD MARUTHI GROUP BUILDINGS 2ND FLOOR, NEAR SIT COLLEGE MAIN GATE B.H. ROAD TUMKUR – 572 103.
3. M/S. ANVITA ENTERPRISES NAYANA NILAYA BEHIND NATARAJA CLINIC OPP. STATE BANK OF MYSORE SIRA GATE TUMKUR – 572 101 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ASHOK N. NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2 & R3 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER OF ALLOTMENT DATED 21.09.2017 IN ANNEXURE-A BY THE R-2 TO THE R-3 UNDER WHICH THE R-3 WAS ALLOTTED 0.29 ACRE OF LAND BEARING PLOT NO.74 OF VASANTHANARASAPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, 2ND PHASE, TUMKURU DISTRICT AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None for the petitioners.
Sri Ashok N. Nayak, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
None had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 24.06.2019, whereupon this Court had passed the following order:
“None for the petitioners.
Awaiting appearance of the counsel for the petitioners, hearing of the petition is deferred.
It is made clear that in case none appears on behalf of the petitioners on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders shall be passed.
List after two weeks.”
Today also when the matter is called, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE ca