Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

G Ramayee vs The Principal Commissioner And Commissioner For Revenue Administration And Others

Madras High Court|14 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.DHANDAPANI, J.
tsi Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has already become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
14.09.2017 tsi To
1. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
2. The District Collector, Salem.
W.P.No.35998 of 2004
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

G Ramayee vs The Principal Commissioner And Commissioner For Revenue Administration And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani